Vampire Assassins

Check it out! It's a combination of two of our favorite social games!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vampire_Assassins

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1e7sCZ-dr6l1PtUf1wQpL7BaEopBkM_qqTUmMM_ka62c/edit
It puts action into a Mafia game. Essentially there are the two sides of Vampire Hunt/Mafia, each side has a specific type of artifact/weapon that can be used to kill/convert one of the others. For example if we held a game, Vampires bite civilians to convert them with forks, civilians slay vampires with spoons. This forces the vampires to actually utilize stealth and kill with as little witnesses as possible. It also gives people incentive to try alliances and investigate physically instead of just yelling random crap without care on an online forum's bogus "town council". Doing away with the stupid town council thing in the original vampire hunt makes the game more realistic.

My version:
Yes, I noticed that you can simply offer to be stabbed with a spoon/vampire killing artifact to prove your innocence, but we can just make a house ruling for no special artifacts for either side. We can add in the special roles to make things even more interesting, including the Tohno Clan Head/Detective, the Alchemist, and the Burial Agent. Daily Powers would actually be used on a daily basis. We should also make a ruling that vampire kills are just kills, not conversions, so Vampire side doesn't become a broken OP snowball. Victory conditions are when one of the sides is completely slain, humans are no exception, because it is completely possible for the last remaining human to be a total badass and destroy the entire horde of vampires coming after him.

Another idea:
To prevent spoiling proof of one's identity by simply showing one's note or email from the GM, the GM can assign roles by giving each player a folded sheet of paper with their role printed on it in size 20 Times New Roman font black text, a piece of evidence which can be so easily replicated or forged by almost anyone that it cannot be accepted as proof.

Based on the evidence, this level of reasoning is possible for Erika Furudo. What do you think, everyone?
Admittedly there are still a bunch of major flaws, so I'll take any suggestions, THE BEST YOU'VE GOT!!

This is good idea. You should make the google doc publicly view-able (not editable). This will promote healthy discussion/hatred

It is. I'm kind of sad no one else has commented on it though.